Skip to main content

Full text of "Chronon corrections to the Dirac equation"

See other formats

Chronon corrections to the Dirac equation 


Andrei A. Galiautdinov and David R. Finkelstein 

School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0430 

February 1, 2008 



. ■ Abstract 

I ^ i The Dirac equation is not semisimple. We therefore regard it as a contraction of a simpler 

decontracted theory. The decontracted theory is necessarily purely algebraic and non-local. In 

■ one simple model the algebra is a Clifford algebra with 6A^ generators. The quantum imaginary 
hi is the contraction of a dynamical variable whose back-reaction provides the Dirac mass. The 
simplified Dirac equation is exactly Lorentz invariant but its symmetry group is SO(3,3), a 

• decontraction of the Poincare group, and it has a slight but fundamental non-locality beyond 

. that of the usual Dirac equation. On operational grounds the non-locality is ~ 10"'^^ sec in 

size and the associated mass is about the Higgs mass. 

■ There is a non-standard small but unique spin-orbit coupling ~ 1/-/V, whose observation 
would be some evidence for the simpler theory. All the fields of the Standard Model call for 
similar non-local simplification. 

&: 1 Introduction 

We begin with basic concepts: 
^ I A simple theory is one with simple (irreducible) dynamical and symmetry groups. What 

' is not simple or semi-simple we call compound. A contraction of a theory is a deformation of 

^ the theory in which some physical scale parameter, called the simplifier, approaches a singular 

limit, taken to be with no loss of generality. The contraction of a simple theory is in general 
compound ^J. By simplification we mean the more creative, non-unique inverse process, 

finding a simple theory that contracts to a given compound theory and agrees better with 
experiment. The main revolutions in physics of the twentieth century were simplifications 
with simplifiers c,G,h. 

One sign of a compound theory is a breakdown of reciprocity, the principle that every 
coupling works both ways. The classic example is Galilean relativity. There reciprocity be- 
tween space and time breaks down; boosts couple time into space and there is no reciprocal 
coupling. Special relativity established reciprocity by replacing the compound Galilean bundle 
of space fibers over the time base by the simple Minkowski space-time. Had Galileo insisted 
on simplicity and reciprocity he could have formulated special relativity in the 17th century 
(unless he were to choose S0(4) instead of S0(l,3)). Every bundle theory violates reciprocity 


as much as Galileo's. The bundle group couples the base to the fiber but not conversely. Every 
bundle theory cries out for simplification. 

This now requires us to establish reciprocity between space-time (base coordinates) 
and energy-momenta (fiber coordinates) p^. [Segal [|l| postulated x <-> p symmetry exactly 
on grounds of algebraic simplicity; his work stimulated that of Inonii and Wigner, and ours. 
Born [Q] postulated x ^ p reciprocity, on the grounds that it is impossible in principle to 
measure the usual four-dimensional interval of two events within an atom. We see no law 
against measuring space-time coordinates and intervals at that gross scale. We use his term 
"reciprocity" in a broader sense that includes his.] 

Einstein's gravity theory and the Standard Model of the other forces are bundle theories, 
with field space as fiber and space-time as base. Therefore these theories are ripe for simpli- 
fication [^. Here we simplify a spinor theory, guided by criteria of experimental adequacy, 
operationality, causality, and finity. 

Classical field theory is but a singular limit of quantum field theory; it suffices to simplify 
the quantum field theory. Quantum field theory in turn we regard as many-quantum theory. 
Its field variables all arise from spin variables of single quanta. Yiy quantification we mean 
the transition from the one-body to the many-body theory, converting yes-or-no predicates 
about an individual into how-many predicates about an aggregate of isomorphic individuals; 
as distinct from quantization. For example, a spinor field theory arises by quantifying the 
theory of a single quantum of spin 1/2. 

To unify field with space-time in quantum field theory, it suffices to unify spin with space- 
time in the one-quantum theory, and to quantify the resulting theory. We unify in this paper 
and quantify in a sequel. 

Some unification programs concern themselves with simplifying just the internal symmetry 
group of the elementary particles, ignoring the fracture between the internal and external vari- 
ables. They attempt to unify (say) the hypercharge, isospin and color variables, separate from 
the space-time variables. Here we close the greatest wound first, expecting that the internal 
variables will unite with each other when they unite with the external variables; as uniting 
space with time incidentally unified the electric and magnetic fields. We represent space-time 
variables x'^ and as approximate descriptions of many spin variables, in one quantum-spin- 
space-time structure described in a higher-dimensional spin algebra. This relativizes the split 
between field and space-time, as Einstein relativized the split between space and time. 

The resulting quantum atomistic space-time consists of many small exactly Lorentz-invariant 
isomorphic quantum bits, qubits which we call chronons. [Feynman, Penrose and Weizsacker 
attempted to atomize space or space-time into quantum spins. Feynman wrote a space-time 
vector as the sum of a great many Dirac spin-operator vectors Q, x^ ~ Z]n7'^(^)' Penrose 
dissected the sphere S'^ into a spin network [^; his work inspired this program. Weizsacker 
[^, attempted a cosmology of spin-1/2 urs. The respective groups are Feynman's S0(3, 1), 
Penrose's S0(3), Weizsackers SU(2) and our SO(37V,3iV) {N > 1).] 

Simplifying a physical theory generally detaches us from a supporting condensate. [For 
Galileo and Kepler, the condensate was the Earth's crust, and to detach from it they moved 
in thought to a ship or the moon, respectively [|9|, 0].] In the present situation of physics 
the prime condensate is the ambient vacuum. Atomizing space-time enables us to present 
the vacuum as a condensate of a simple system, and to detach from it in thought by a phase 
transition, a space-time melt-down. 


Chronons carry a fundamental time-unit Xi one of our simplifiers. We have argued that x 
is much greater than the Planck time and is on the order of the Higgs time Ti/Mhc^ . [In an 
earlier effort to dissect space-time, assuming multiple Fermi-Dirac statistics for the elements 
[|ll], |12|. This false start led us eventually to the Clifford- Wilczek statistics |l|, ^\ 
an example of Clifford- Wilczek statistics is unwittingly developed in chapter 16 of [|12| .] We 
now replace the classical Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics of space-time events with the simple 
Clifford- Wilczek statistics appropriate for distinguishable isomorphic units. This enormously 
reduces the problem of forming a theory. 

We single out two main quantifications in field theories like gravitation and the Standard 

A classical quantification assembles a space-time from individual space-time points. 

A separate quantification constructs a many-quantum theory or quantum field theory from 
a one-quantum theory on that space-time. 

In the standard physics the space-time quantification tacitly assumes Maxwell-Boltzmann 
statistics for the elements of space-time, and the field quantification uses Fermi-Dirac or Bose- 
Einstein statistics. The simplified theory we propose uses one Clifford quantification for all of 
these purposes. 

In this paper we work only with one-quantum processes of A'^ ^ 1 chronons. To describe 
several quanta and their interactions, getting closer to field theory and experiment, will require 
no further quantification, but only additional internal combinatory structure that is readily 
accomodated within the one Clifford- Wilczek quantification. 

Each physical theory defines at least three algebras that should be simple: the associative 

operator algebra of the system |12, 15], the kinematical Lie algebra consisting of possible 
Hamiltonians, and the symmetry Lie algebra of one preferred Hamiltonian. 

There is no second quantization. But there is a second simplification; and a third, and so 
on, all of different kinds with different simplifiers. Each of the historic revolutions that guide 
us now introduced a simplifier, small on the scale of previous experience and therefore long 
overlooked, into the multiplication table and basis elements of one or more of these algebras, 
and so deformed a compound algebra into a simpler algebra that works better. Among these 
simplifiers are c, G, and fi. 

Here we simplify the free Dirac equation and its underlying Dirac-Heisenberg (real unital 
associative) algebra 

^DH = Ad ® Ah, (1) 

the tensor product of the Dirac and the relativistic Heisenberg algebras, in turn defined as 

Relativistic Heisenberg algebra Ah = A[i,p,x] is generated by the imaginary unit i 
and the space-time and energy- momentum translation generators Pu := ipu = —fid/dx^ and 
:= ix^ , subject to the relations 

= 0, 

= 0, 
= 0, 

fix^l = 0, 


= -1. (2) 

Here g^^ is the Minkowski metric, held fixed in this paper. The hats (on p, for example) 
indicate that a factor i has been absorbed to make the operator anti-Hermitian jl^. The 
algebra has both the usual associative product and the Lie commutator product. As a real 
Lie algebra is compound, Segal emphasized, containing the non-trivial ideal generated by 
the unit i. 

The orbital Lorentz-group generators are 

Q^^y := iQi"' = -i {x^'f - x^p^") . (3) 
These automatically obey the usual relations 

[x^',^^^] = h (g^'^x^ - g^'^x") , 
[p^O^^] = hlg'^'^p'-g^'^p-'), 
[i,df"'] = 0. (4) 

Dirac algebra = ^[7^] is generated by Dirac-Clifford units 7^ subject to the familiar 

{luHfi} = 2gu^,. (5) 
As usual we write j^i,,,, for the anti-symmetric part of the tensor 7^4 7,^ .... 

Statistics One may define the statistics of an (actual, not virtual) aggregate by defining 
how the aggregate transforms under permutations of its units. That is, to describe units 

with given unit mode space Vi [12, [l^ we give, first, the mode space Vn of the aggregate 
quantum system and, second, a simple representation Rn : Sn ^ End Va^ of the permutation 
group Siv on the given N units by linear operators on V/v- This also defines the quantification 
that converts yes-or-no questions about the individual into how-many questions about a crowd. 

In Clifford statistics End Vat is a Clifford algebra C = Cliff(Vi), and so Vn is a spinor space 
for that Clifford algebra, with C = End V/v- We write Ci for the first-degree subspace of C. A 
Clifford statistics is defined by a projective (double- valued) representation Rc : Sat — > Ci C C 
of the permutation group Sat by first-grade Clifford elements over the unit mode space Vi . 
To define Rc we associate with the nth unit (for all n = 1, . . . , N) a Clifford unit 7„, and we 
represent every swap (transposition or 2-cycle) (mn) of two distinct units by the difference 
i(7n — 7m) G Ci of the associated Clifford units. 

For a free Clifford statistics the units 7^ are independent and the metric gmn is Euclidean. 
This representation has dimension 2^^"^ and is reducible. The irreducible representations have 
dimension |2^] 

2^^! = 1,1,2,2,4,4,8,8,16,... 
forDimFi = A = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,... . (6) 

Some useful terms: 


A cliffordon is a quantum with Clifford statistics. 
A squadron is a quantum aggregate of cliffordons. 
A sih is a quantum aggregate of bosons. 
A set of quanta is an aggregate of fermions. 

A sequence of quanta is a aggregate of Maxwell-Boltzmann quanta with a given sequential 
order ||ll]. 

Rc can be extended to a spinor representation of SO(A^) D Sat on the same spinor space 

The symmetry group Gu of the quantum kinematics for a universe U of Nu chronons is 
an orthogonal group 

Gu = SO{Nu+,Nu-), 

Nu = Nu+ + Nu-. (7) 
The algebra of observables of U is the simple finite-dimensional real Clifford algebra 

Cu = cm{Vi) = ciifr[i, 7(1), . . . , i{Nu)] (8) 

generated by the Nu Clifford units 7(n), n = 1, . . . ,Nu representing exchanges. The Clifford 
units 7(n) span a vector space Vi = Ci of first-grade elements of Cu- 
Within Cu we shall construct a simplified Dirac-Heisenberg algebra 

A^^ = A[i,p,x,^]cC{Vi) (9) 

whose commutator Lie algebra is simple and which contracts to the usual Dirac-Heisenberg 
algebra tIdh in the continuum limit. We factor tIdh into the Clifford product 

ioH = Clifr(A^6o) = Clifr((iV - l)6o) U Cliff(6o) (10) 

of two Clifford algebras, an "internal" algebra from the last hexad and an "external" algebra 
from all the others. 

We designate our proposed simplifications of 7 and i,p, x, and O by 7 and i,p,x and O. 
In the limit X the tildes ~ disappear and the breves " become hats ' . 
We use the following quadratic spaces: 

A^R := R e . . . e R (with terms) = 0f R is the positive-definite A^-dimensional real 
quantum-mode space. 

— AR is the corresponding negative-definite space. 

M is Minkowski space with signature 1 — 3. 

— M is the same space with the opposite signature 3 — 1. 



= Ae( 


= R, 


= -R, 


= 3R, 


= -3R, 


= 10 3, 


-M := 3 9 1, 
60 := 3 6 3. 


M and — M are tangent spaces to Minkowski space-times and support natural representations 
of the Lorentz group. 

2 Simplification of the relativistic Heisenberg alge- 

As already mentioned, field theory employs a compound field-space-time bundle with space- 
time for base and field-space for fiber; just as Galilean space-time is a four-dimensional bundle 
with for base and M} for fiber. The prototype is the covector field, where the fiber is the 
cotangent space to space-time, with coordinates that we designate by p^. 

We assume that in experiments of sufficiently high resolution the space-time tangent bundle 
(or the Dirac-Heisenberg algebra) manifests itself as a simple quantum-field-space-time syn- 
thesis. The space-time variables x'^ and the tangent space variables unite into one simple 
construct, as space and time have already united. Now, however, the simplification requires 
an atomization, because the field variable actually derives from an atomic spin. 

We first split the space-time tangent bundle into quantum cells. The minimum number 
of elements in a cell for our simplification is six: four for space-time and two for a complex 
or symplectic plane. We provisionally adopt the hexadic cell. Earlier work, done before our 
present stringent simplicity standard, assumed a pentadic cell | |16| . This provided no natural 
correspondent for the energy-momentum operators. 

hexads define a unit mode space Vi = N6q. Each term 60 has a Clifford algebra 
Cliff(3, 3) whose spinors have eight real components, forming an 89. [Eight-component spinors 
have also been used in physics by Penrose |^, Robson and Staudte ||2l|, and Lunsford p^ ; 
though not to unify spin with space-time.] The spinors of V form the spinor space 


(g)8o = 8^ 


We do not deal with empty space-time. We explore space-time with one relativistic quan- 
tum spin-i probe of rest mass m ~ We express the usual spin operators 7'^, space-time 
position operators x^, and energy-momentum operators p^ of this probe as contractions of 
operators in the Clifford algebra Cliff (3A'', 3A^). 

We write the dynamics of the usual contracted, compound Dirac theory in manifestly 
covariant form, with a Poincare-scalar Dirac operator 

D = -f>'p^ - mc. (12) 

D belongs to the algebra of operators on spinor-valued functions 'ip(x'^) on space-time. Any 
physical spinor %l){x^) is to obey the dynamical equation 

Dip = 0. (13) 


We simplify the dynamical operator preserving the form of the dynamical equation (p!^). 

The compound symmetry group for the Dirac equation is the covering group of the Poincare 
group ISO(M). We represent this as the contraction of a simple group SO(3,3) acting on the 
spinor pseudo-Hilbert (ket) space of 6A^ Clifford generators j^{n) (a; = 0, . . . , 5; n = 1, . . . , A'') 
of the orthogonal group S0(3A^, 3A^). The size of the experiment fixes the parameter A^. 

We first simplify the anti-Hermitian space-time and energy-momentum translation gen- 
erators and x'^, not the associated Hermitian observables p^, . Then we simplify the 
Hermitian operators by multiplying the anti-Hermitian ones by a suitably simplified i and 
symmetrizing the product. 

As in Dirac one-electron theory, we use the spinor representation Spin(M) of SO(M) to 
describe the contracted generators S^'^ of rotations and boosts. The spin generators are rep- 
resented by second-degree elements 

^^'^:=^[7^71^|7'^^ /i,z. = 0,...,3 (14) 

of the Clifford algebra Cliff (1,3). 

We simplify ISO(M) within Spin(A^6o) by representing the simplified space-time symmetry 
generators of the probe by second degree elements of Cliff Vi. We associate the position and 
momentum axes with the 7^ and 7^ elements of the hexad respectively, so that an infinitesimal 
orthogonal transformation in the 45-plane couples momentum into position. This accounts for 
the symplectic symmetry of classical mechanics and the i of quantum mechanics. 

We therefore define the simplified i, x^, and p"^ of the probe by 

^ N-l ^ Af-l 

_ y i(n) := —— y 7^ 

n=l n=l 
N-l N-l 

n=l n=l 
N-l N-l 

^r(n) := <AE7'^'(n), (15) 

n=l n=l 

where Xi 4* ^iid A^ are simplifiers of our theory, and 

^P-(n):=l[7^(n),7-(n)]. (16) 

To support this choice for the expanded generators we form the following commutation 
relations among them (c/. |]23| , |l|, p4|): 

= -2cPxiN-l)9^''i, 

4y2 . 





^ n=l 
?) ^ 

>^ := -Y^^f^'^(n)=L^"' + S>"'. (18) 

^ n=l 

where S^'^ is the Dirac spin operator (c/. (p9|)), 

( [T7| ) incorporates two decontractions: one leading to finite commutators between coordi- 
nates of the Snyder type, and one leading to finite commutators between hi and the coordinates 
and momenta of the Segal type. Both are necessary for simplicity. 

The Snyder decontraction makes the theory more non-local than the Dirac equation. In 
the contracted theory, the coordinates x, y, z commute. This means that in principle one can 
produce the single quantum at a definite place and register it at a definite place. To be sure, to 
do so will mix positive and negative energy levels. In the more physical many-quantum theory, 
a pair will be created in these processes. Nevertheless, in the standard interpretation of the 
quantum theory it is still possible in principle to precisely determine the operators x, y, z with 
arbitrary precision at one instant, before the pair separates. 

In the decontracted theory, any one of the operators x, y, z can be determined with arbi- 
trary precision, say z. Its spectrum will then be discrete. The operators x, y will then have 
fundamental indeterminacies, depending on the magnitude of Lz and the constant x- Thus 
the single quantum can no longer be localized in principle. This non-locality is intrinsic to the 
space-time-momentum-energy-spin unification that makes the theory simpler. 

J^'^ obeys the Lorentz- group commutation relations: 

J^«] = n {g^'^r'' - g''^J^'^ - g^'^r^ + ^'^'^J^^) , (19) 
and generates a total Lorentz transformation of the variables x^, p^, i and S^^: 

n (g^^'x^ - gf'^x^') , 


0. (20) 
There is a mock orbital angular momentum generator of familiar appearance, 

6^'' — -{(x^f -rp^). (21) 

O too obeys the Lorent group commutation relations. We relate L^" and O^" in Sec.^. 

Since the usual complex unit i is central and the simplified i is not, we suppose that the 
contraction process includes a projection that restricts the probe to one of the two-dimensional 
invariant subspaces of i, associated with the maximum negative eigenvalue —1 oi ^ . This 

\x^,r^\ = 


represents a condensation that aligns all the mutually commuting hexad spins 7^^(n) with 
each other, so that 

7^^(n)7^^(n') -1, (22) 

for any n and n'. We call this the condensation of i. 

Projection onto a sharp value of i kills i-changing variables like and p^. Only S0(2)- 
invariant combinations like x^p"^ + 0^3;^ should survive. Nonetheless one observes position and 
momentum separately. This is a spontaneous symmetry-breaking by the vacuum condensate, 
analogous to the fact that a crystal in its ground state, with spherically symmetric Hamiltonian, 
can have a non-zero internal magnetization. 

Under Wigner time-reversal, t ^ —t and i ^ —i. Since the variable t is chosen by the 
experimenter, not the system, we must suppose that i too is mainly fixed by the experimenter, 
not the system. But since the boundary between system and experimenter is somewhat ar- 
bitrary, we must therefore suppose that the entire universe contributes uniformly to i; it is 
simply that the system is much smaller than the experimenter, and influences i less. This fits 
with an earlier theory of z as a Stiickelberg-Higgs variable that imparts mass to some otherwise 

massless gauge vector bosons ||2^, ^ 

Then the momentum variables that we usually attribute to the system, for example, 
are actually i-invariant bilinear combinations P^^^Jp^ of experimenter standards Pj^'j^ and the 
system tensor Jp^-. As creatures of the space-time condensate we do not experience the sym- 
metry of the dynamics that produced it, but only its residual symmetries. The spontaneously 
broken symmetries reappear when the condensate melts down. 

To recover the canonical commutation relations for and we must impose 

X<t^{N -1)^1 (23) 

and assume that 

X ^ 0, 
</> ^ 0, 

N ^ oo. (24) 

Then the relations (17) reduce to the commutation relations (|2D of the relativistic Heisenberg 
algebra Ah as required. 

The three parameters 4'^ 1/-^ ^ire subject to one constraint x4'i^ ~ 1) = leaving two 
independent simplifiers. is not a physical constant like h and c, but depends on the scope 
of the experiment, and is under the experimenter's control. A^-dependent effects might appear 
as curious boundary effects. We set a cosmological limit A^ < Amsx below. 

This leaves one A^-independent physical constant with the dimensions of time. We can 
consider two contractions, X ~^ with N constant, and A ^ oo with x constant. They 
combine into the continuum limit x ~^ 0; A — > oo. We fix one simplifier x iii SecQ by 
supposing that the mass of a probe approaches a finite limit as A — > cx). 

3 Orbital, spin, and total angular momentum 

As was shown in SecJ^, three sets of operators obeying Lorentz-group commutation relations 
appear in our theory. L^^'^ represents the simpified orbital angular momentum generators, 


S^'^ represents the spin angular momentum, and J^^ represents the simphfied total angular 
momentum generators. There is a mock orbital angular momentum O^^ (0)- 

In this section we show that O ^ L in the contraction limit. 

Consider O^^ . By definition, 

, /N-l N-1 N-1 N~l \ N-1 

\n=l n'=l n=l n'=l I m=l 

N . , , 

, X0 

Y E (7'^'(n)7"'(n')-7'^'(n)7'^'(n')+7^'(n)7'^'(n)-7"'(n')7'^'(n)) 

X E 

n m 

+ E (7'^'(n)7^'(n')-7'^'(n)7^'(n') + 7^'(n)7'^'H-7^'(n)7'^'(n)) 

X E ^''M- (25) 

Thus, in the contraction limit (p^)-(p^) when condensation singles out the eigenspace of 
7^^(n)7^^(n') with eigenvalue -1, 

Q,,u — ^ jt^u _ g^u ^ l,,u^ ^26) 

as asserted. 

4 Simplified Dirac dynamics 

Dirac's one-body theory in real (Majorana) form uses the operator algebra Adh acting on a 
vector space 

Vi := S-M. (27) 

of spinor-valued wavefunctions, mapping the space-time to the spinor space T, = E(— M) over 
the Minkowski space-time — M. This exhibits part of the compound structure we must simplify 


by decontr action, the spht between spin space S and space-time M. We construct the new 
space entirely from spins, replacing the infinite-dimensional function space Vi by a spinor space 
of high but finite dimensionality. 

To simplify Dirac's spin-^ dynamics, we regard the position of the probe as the resultant of 
N quantum steps, each represented by one hexad of chronons. We identify the spin variables 
of the probe with those of the last hexad in (0), the growing tip of the world line of the probe. 

We thereby simplify the Dirac-Heisenberg algebra ^dh to Adh := Cliff(A^6o), the Clifford 
algebra of a large squadron of cliffordons. 

To construct the contraction from Aqh to Adh, we group the generators of Cliff (3A^, 3A^) into 
N hexads 7'^(n) (cj = 0, . . . , 5; n = 1, . . . , N). Each hexad algebra acts on eight-component 
real spinors in Sq. Hexad N will be used for the spin of the quantum. The remaining — 1 
hexads provide the space-time variables. 

We identify the usual Dirac gammas for = 0, . . . , 3 of Cliff(— M) with second-degree 
elements of the last hexad: 

■=J^'^{N) (28) 
Dirac's spin generators S^'^ (0) simplify to the corresponding 16 components of the tensor 

S'^p ■=^^'^p(N), (29) 

where u), p = 0, . . . ,5 and /i, z/ = 0, . . . , 3. 

It is now straightforward to simplify the Dirac equation Dtp = of (|l3|). The internal 
degrees of freedom will be seen to contribute a rest mass term rriy. = h/2xc, and for simplicity 
we take this to be the entire rest mass of the Dirac equation, omitting any bare mass term in 
D. We simplify D ^ D and extend the internal symmetry group from S0(l,3) to the group 
SO (3, 3) of a hexad by setting 


D:=^ S'^PL^p, (30) 

where (c/. (|T|)) 

■='iYl 7c<;p("-)- (31) 
^ n=l 

Our proposed dynamical operator is invariant under a conformal group S0(3, 3) whose 
contraction includes the Poincare group. [Our symmetry group S0(3, 3) incorporates and 
extends the SO(3,2) symmetry possessed by Dirac's dynamics for an electron in de-Sitter 
space-time [^9|. That dynamics has the form 

D' = ^ISS'^'O^P - "^c, 

where S^p and O^p are the five-dimensional spinorial and orbital angular momentum gener- 
ators and R is the radius of the de-Sitter universe. Its group is still compound, not simple, 
unifying translations, rotations and boosts, but not symplectic transformations.] 

A complete set of commuting generators for the Poincare group IS 0(1, 3) consists of the 
time translation generator po, the rotation generator L12, and the boost generator L03. In the 
present context, we adjoin the imaginary unit i. In the proposed simplification IS0(1,3) x 


S0(2) ^ S0(3, 3) these simplify according to po <— Lo4) -^^12 ^ I-'i2, Lo3 ^ -C'OS) ^ ^ -^45- 
A commuting set cannot contain both L04 and L45. Since varying energy is more famihar 
than varying i, in a first treatment we hold L45 constant and couple different masses in one 

5 Reduction to the Poincare group 

We now assume a condensation that reduces S0(3, 3) to its subgroup S0(1, 3) x S0(2). Relative 
to this reduction, the D of (|30|) breaks up into 

D = |^-P(iV)^^^^(n) (a;,p = 0,l,...,5) 


+ (/.7''(iV)"E745(n) 


= r'p^.--7^^x^ + ^r''L^u + {N-l)cl>-f^''i. (32) 

In the condensate all the operators 7^^(?^)745(?^-') attain their minimum eigenvalue — 1. 

(AT- 1)0^45^ _^ _^ (33) 

and the dynamics becomes 

D = 7^' P,. --r^x^+'^ -i^- L^, - m^c, (34) 

with rest mass 

-X = 4- (35) 

For sufficently large this reduces to the usual Dirac dynamics. 

We identify the mass with the A-independent mass m of the Dirac equation for the 
most massive individual quanta that the condensate can propagate without melt-down, on the 
order of the top quark or Higgs masses: 

~ 10^ GeV, x ^ 10"^^ sec . (36) 

The universe is ~ 10^'' years old. This leads to an upper bound 

Am... -10^1. (37) 

This implies that x is independent of A as A ^ 00 and that (j) ~ 1/A^ — > as A — > 00 
even for finite x- Iii experiments near the Higgs energy, p ~ fi/x- If we also determine A by 
setting X ~ Ax then all four terms in ( |3^ are of the same order of magnitude. 

To estimate experimental effects, however, we must take gauge transformations into ac- 
count. These transform the second term away in the continuum limit. This refinement of the 
theory is still in progress. 


6 Conclusions 

Like classical Newtonian mechanics, the Dirac equation has a compound (non-semisimple) 
invariance group. Its variables break up into three mutually commuting sets: the space-time- 
energy-momcntum variables {x^, p^), the spin variables j^, and the imaginary unit i. 

To unify them we replace the space-time continuum by an aggregate of M < oo finite 
elements, chronons, described by spinors with ~ 2*^/^ components. Chronons have Clifford- 
Wilczek statistics, whose simple operator algebra is generated by units 7"*, m = 1, . . . , M. We 
express all the variables x^,p^,j^ and i as polynomials in the 7™. We group the M = 6iV 
chronons into N hexads for this purpose, corresponding to tangent spaces; the hexad is the least 
cell that suffices for this simplification. There are three simplifiers x,0, 1/-/V, all approaching 
in the continuum limit, subject to the constraint x4> ~ 1) = for all N. 

In the continuum limit the Dirac mass becomes infinite. In our theory, the finite Dirac 
masses in nature are consequences of a finite atomistic quantum space-time structure with 


The theory predicts a certain spin-orbit coupling ^^^'^L^j^n not found in the Standard Model, 
and vanishing only in the continuum limit. The experimental observation of this spin-orbit 
coupling would further indicate the existence of a chronon. 

In this theory, the spin we see in nature is a manifestation of the (Clifford) statistics of 
atomic elements of space-time, as Brownian motion is of the atomic elements of matter. As 
we improve our theory we will interpret better other indications of chronon structure that we 
already have, and as we improve our measuring techniques we shall meet more such signs. 


This work was aided by discussions with James Baugh, Heinrich Sailer and Prank Wilczek. It 
was partially supported by the M. and H. Ferst Foundation. 


[1] I.E. Segal, Duke Math. J. 18, 221 (1951) 

[2] E. Inonii and E. P. Wigner, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 39, 510 (1952) 

[3] E. Inonii, Contraction of Lie Groups and their Representations, in F. Giirsey, ed.. Group 
Theoretical Consepts and Methods in Elementary Particle Physics, pp. 391-402 (Gordon 
and Breach, Science publishers. New York, 1964) 

[4] M. Born, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 463 (1949) 

[5] J. Baugh, D. Finkelstein, A. Galiautdinov, and H. Sailer, J. Math. Phys. 42, 1489 (2001) 
[6] R.P. Feynman, private communication. 

[7] R. Penrose, Angular momentum: an approach to combinatorial space-time, in T. Bastin, 
ed., Quantum Theory and Beyond, pp. 151-180 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 

[8] C.F. von Weizsacker, Aufbau der Physik (Hauser, Munich, 1986) 


[9] G. Galilei, Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems, ptolemaic and copernican. 
Translated by S. Drake, foreword by A. Einstein. 2d edition (University of California Press, 
Berkeley, 1967) 

[10] J. Kepler, Somnium; the dream, or posthumous work on lunar astronomy. Translated with 
a commentary by E. Rosen (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1967) 

[11] D. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. 184, 1261 (1969); ihid. D5, 2922 (1972) 

[12] D. Finkelstein, Quantum Relativity (Springer- Verlag, New York, 1996) 

[13] F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D25, 553 (1982) 

[14] C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B479, 529 (1996) 

[15] F. Wilczek, |hep-th/9806228| [LANL] 

[16] D.R. Finkelstein and E. Rodriguez, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 23, 887 (1984) 

[17] D. Finkelstein and A. Galiautdinov, J. Math. Phys. 42, 3299 (2001) 

[18] D. Finkelstein, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 447 (1999) 

[19] S. L. Adler, Quaternionic quantum mechanics and quantum fields (Oxford University 
Press, New York, 1995) 

[20] I. Schur, Journal fiir die reine und angewandte Mathematik 139, 155 (1911) 

[21] B.A. Robson and D.S. Staudte, J. Phys. A29, 157 (1996); D.S. Staudte, J. Phys. A29, 
169 (1996) 

[22] D.R. Lunsford, private communication. 

[23] H.S. Snyder, Phys. Rev. 71, 38 (1947); ihid. 72, 68 (1947) 

[24] S. Doplicher, hep-tli/0105251| [LANL], and references cited therein. 

[25] E.C.G. Stiickelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 11, 299 (1938) 

[26] D. Finkelstein, J.M. Jauch, and D. Speiser, Quaternion quantum mechanics I, II, III. 
European Center for Nuclear Research, Geneva, CERN Reports 59-7, 59-11, 59-17 (1959). 
Reprinted in C.A. Hooker, ed.. The Logico- Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, 
volume 2, Reidel (1979). 

[27] D. Finkelstein, J.M. Jauch, S. Schiminovich, and D. Speiser, J. Math. Phys. 4, 788 (1962) 

[28] P. Higgs, Phys. Lett. 12, 132 (1964); Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964); Phys. Rev. 145, 
1156 (1966) 

[29] P.A.M. Dirac, Ann. Math. 36, 657 (1935)